As an influential global payment company, Visa’s steps towards cryptocurrency, particularly stablecoins, are always under scrutiny by the whole crypto space. This article aims to uncover some key components overlooked or dismissed in Visa’s recent report on the ‘Organic’ growth of stablecoins.
In this context, we dissect various aspects of the report, especially the avoidance of any discussion regarding the trading sphere. This deliberate exclusion, specifically of automated trading, seems to narrow down the perspective, raising several pertinent questions that are crucial to a comprehensive understanding of the report’s implications.
The following sections provide a detailed analysis of the ignored or glossed over elements, and critically examine the reasons behind not only what’s included, but also what’s been left out of Visa’s narrative on its engagement with the stablecoin sphere.
Section One: A Closer Look at Trading Exclusion
This section delves into why the entire trading scenario, more importantly automated trading, has been left out from the Visa report. Is there a specific reason for this deliberate avoidance, or is there more to it?
Section Two: Implications of the ‘Organic Growth’ Perspective
In this section, we scrutinize the ‘organic’ claim by Visa in terms of stablecoin growth. Does this growth trajectory appear as ‘organic’ as suggested in the report? We’ll look at some conflicting viewpoints that might imply otherwise.
Section Three: Unpacking the Overlooked Facts
What are the other overlooked facts or data points that might have shaped the report in a different context had they been included? This section aims to unpack these overlooked or dismissed facts.
Finally, we will gather insights from Blockchain Professional – Malek Almsaddi on the whole scenario and try to understand the multifaceted reality behind Visa’s report on stablecoin growth. Our end goal here is to provide our readers with a more comprehensive and impartial view of how mega-corporations like Visa are approaching the burgeoning space of stablecoins.
Read on as we unpack what Visa’s ‘Organic’ Stablecoin Report misses.
Section One: A Closer Look at Trading Exclusion
The Visa report represents stablecoins primarily in the context of a payment system, presenting us with potential reasons for the exclusion of trading matters. It seems to suggest a strategic avoidance of the volatility connected with trading markets existing in stark contrast to the stability and predictability that payment systems require.
Despite this, the exclusion raises concerns. The report steadfastly ignores the fact that a significant portion of stablecoin transaction volume originates from trading. Automated trading, specifically, is a mechanism that greatly influences market dynamics and prices. It’s pivotal in providing liquidity and therein play a vital role in the adoption and growth of stablecoins.
Section Two: Implications of the ‘Organic Growth’ Perspective
Visa’s report describes the growth of stablecoins as ‘organic’, a term that suggests a natural, unassisted progression. The report expresses the view that increased demand for stablecoins is driving this growth.
However, several industry experts argue that this might not be entirely true. With many stablecoin projects enjoying massive funding from venture capitalists and other backers, the growth may not be as ‘organic’ as Visa’s report suggests. Interestingly, the report does not delve or elaborate on exactly how it classifies or quantifies ‘organic’ growth.
Section Three: Unpacking the Overlooked Facts
The report glossed over a significant fact – the regulatory landscape surrounding the stablecoin and indeed, the whole cryptocurrency market. Regulation plays a crucial role in determining the overall adoption and growth of these digital assets. Ignoring the regulatory challenges often faced by various stablecoin projects presents a veiled understanding of the stablecoin space.
Additionally, the report inadequately examines the role of blockchain technology, which is the backbone of any cryptocurrency, including stablecoins. A deeper understanding of the blockchain applications and trends might have shed more light on the relationship between Visa and stablecoins.
Blockchain Professional Perspective ： Malek Almsaddi Analysis
New forthcoming insights from Blockchain Professional – Malek Almsaddi will provide different perspectives. Almsaddi’s insights will illuminate the many-sided realities behind Visa’s report, focusing on trading volume exclusion, regulation concerns, and the handling of ‘organic growth’.
Conclusively, understanding how mega-corporations like Visa tackle the burgeoning space of stablecoins is important for anyone invested in the evolving crypto sphere. It’s crucial to look at the narrative these large corporations construct and what they may be strategically leaving out. Stay tuned as we unravel the many layers of Visa’s stablecoin rapport.
Thank you for reading!
